Development and validation of a gradient boosting machine to predict prognosis after liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Accurate prognosis assessment is essential for surgically resected intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) while published prognostic tools are limited by modest performance. We therefore aimed to establish a novel model to predict survival in resected ICC based on readily-available clinical parameters using machine learning technique. METHODS: A gradient boosting machine (GBM) was trained and validated to predict the likelihood of cancer-specific survival (CSS) on data from a Chinese hospital-based database using nested cross-validation, and then tested on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The performance of GBM model was compared with that of proposed prognostic score and staging system. RESULTS: A total of 1050 ICC patients (401 from China and 649 from SEER) treated with resection were included. Seven covariates were identified and entered into the GBM model: age, tumor size, tumor number, vascular invasion, number of regional lymph node metastasis, histological grade, and type of surgery. The GBM model predicted CSS with C-Statistics ≥ 0.72 and outperformed proposed prognostic score or system across study cohorts, even in sub-cohort with missing data. Calibration plots of predicted probabilities against observed survival rates indicated excellent concordance. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that the model had high clinical utility. The GBM model was able to stratify 5-year CSS ranging from over 54% in low-risk subset to 0% in high-risk subset. CONCLUSIONS: We trained and validated a GBM model that allows a more accurate estimation of patient survival after resection compared with other prognostic indices. Such a model is readily integrated into a decision-support electronic health record system, and may improve therapeutic strategies for patients with resected ICC.

Surgical practice patterns and outcomes in T2 and T3 gallbladder cancer: a population-based study.

BACKGROUND: The extent of resection required in advanced gallbladder cancer is controversial. We aimed to describe the management and outcomes in patients with resected stage T2 and T3 gallbladder cancer. METHODS: In this population-based study, all T2 and T3 gallbladder cancer cases from Jan. 1, 2002, to Mar. 31, 2012, were identified from the Ontario Cancer Registry; pathology reports were linked and abstracted. The type of resection was classified as extended (cholecystectomy + liver resection, with or without bile duct resection) or simple (cholecystectomy only). We used Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to model time to death and evaluated factors associated with overall survival using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS: A total of 370 patients were included, 232 with T2 disease and 138 with T3 disease. The proportions who underwent extended resection were 24.1% (56/232) and 37.0% (51/138), respectively. The unadjusted 5-year overall survival rates for simple and extended resection were 39.7% and 49.5%, respectively, for T2 disease (p = 0.03), and 13.5% and 22.8%, respectively, for T3 disease (p = 0.05). In adjusted analysis, extended resection significantly improved overall survival among patients with T2 disease (hazard ratio [HR] 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30-0.97), whereas higher grade of differentiation, presence of lymphovascular invasion and positive lymph nodes led to worse survival. Extended resection was not associated with improved survival in the T3 group; however, in subgroup analysis stratified by lymph node status, a trend toward improved overall survival with extended resection was seen in node-negative patients (HR 0.20, 95% CI 0.03-1.06). CONCLUSION: Extended resection improved overall survival in T2 disease regardless of nodal status but appeared most beneficial in node-negative T3 disease. The finding that extended resection was offered only to a small proportion of eligible patients highlights the need for improved knowledge translation at national surgical meetings.

Readmission After Surgical Resection and Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Liver resections and transplantations have increasingly become feasible options for potential cure. These complex surgeries are inherently associated with increased rates of readmission. In the meanwhile, hospital readmission rates are rapidly becoming an important quality of care metric. Therefore, it is very important to understand the effect of 30-day readmission on mortality and the factors associated with increased 30- and 90-day mortality rates. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study utilizing data from the National Cancer Database. Patients included were 18 years or older who underwent liver resection or liver transplantation for HCC between 2003 and 2011. Our primary outcomes of interest were 30- and 90-day mortality rates. Our primary independent variable of interest was 30-day readmission. RESULTS: 16 658 patients underwent either a liver resection or transplantation for HCC between 2003 and 2011. For patients with liver transplantations, increased readmission rates were associated with lower risks of 30-day mortality (P = .012) but a trend toward higher 90-day mortality (P = .057). Patients who underwent liver resection for HCC also demonstrated increased readmission rates to be associated with lower risk of 30-day mortality (P = .014) but higher 90-day mortality (P ≤ .001). CONCLUSION: This is the only study to utilize a national database to investigate the association between readmission rates and mortality rates of both liver transplantations and resections for patients with HCC. We demonstrate 30-day readmission to show no increase in 30-day mortality, but rather higher 90-day mortality.

Resection or ablation versus transarterial therapy for Child-Pugh A patients with a single small hepatocellular carcinoma.

ABSTRACT: Data from a direct comparison of the long-term survival outcomes of surgical resection (SR) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) versus transarterial therapy in Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP)-class A patients with a single small T1/T2 stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (≤3 cm) are still lacking. This study retrospectively compared the therapeutic outcomes of these treatment types for CTP-A patients with a single small HCC.Using a nationwide Korean registry, we identified 2314 CTP-A patients with SR (n = 722), RFA (n = 731), or transarterial therapy (n = 861) for a single (≤3 cm) T1/T2 stage HCC from 2008 to 2014. The posttreatment overall survival (OS) of transarterial therapy with either SR or RFA were compared using the Inverse Probability of treatment Weighting (IPW). The median follow-up period was 50 months (range 1-107 months).After IPW, the cumulative OS rates after SR or RFA were significantly higher than those after transarterial therapy in all subjects (all P values < .05). The OS rates after SR or RFA were better than those after transarterial therapy in patients with the hepatitis B or C virus (all P values < .05), and in patients aged <65 years (all P values < .05). The cumulative OSs between RFA and transarterial therapy were statistically comparable in patients with a 2 to 3 cm HCC and aged ≥65 years, respectively. For all subjects, the weighted Cox proportional hazards model using IPW provided the adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for the OS after SR versus transarterial therapy and after RFA versus transarterial therapy of 0.42 (0.30-0.60) (P < .001) and 0.78 (0.61-0.99) (P = .044), respectively.In CTP-A patients with a single (≤3 cm) T1/T2 HCC, SR or RFA provides a better OS than transarterial therapy, regardless of the HCC etiology (hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus), especially in patients with HCC of <2 cm and aged <65 years.

Factors associated with liver cancer prognosis after hepatectomy: A retrospective cohort study.

ABSTRACT: This article was to investigate risk factors influencing liver cancer prognosis after hepatectomy.Patients undergoing hepatectomy after being diagnosed with liver cancer in Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University were collected in the retrospective cohort study between January 2012 and December 2017, and divided into disease progression and non-progression groups based on their prognostic status. Univariate analysis was performed on the patients' baseline and laboratory test data, with multivariate logistic regression further conducted to investigate the independent risk factors for liver cancer progression after hepatectomy.Among the 288 subjects, 159 had adverse outcomes (death or cancer recurrence). Hepatitis B and high levels of aspartate aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyltransferase, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), direct bilirubin, and total bilirubin as well as low level of lymphocyte (LYM) were found to be associated with disease progression in the univariate analysis, and were introduced into the multivariate logistic regression. The results indicated that patients with high ALP level (odds ratio [OR] = 1.004, 95%CI: 1.002-1.007, P = .003) and with a history of hepatitis B (OR = 2.182, 95%CI: 1.165-4.086, P = .015) had a higher risk of liver cancer progression compared with those of lower ALP level and those without hepatitis B respectively, whereas the elevated level of LYM (OR = 0.710, 95%CI: 0.516-0.978, P = .034) had favorable progression.The elevated ALP level and a history of hepatitis B may increase the risk of death or cancer recurrence, whereas high LYM level may decrease poor progression among liver cancer patients after hepatectomy. More importance should be attached to the improvement of the liver function and treatment of hepatitis B to enable a better outcome for the patients.

The predictive value of vessels encapsulating tumor clusters in treatment optimization for recurrent early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The predictive value of vessels encapsulating tumor clusters (VETC) in recurrent early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the prognostic significance of VETC in patients with recurrent early-stage HCC after repeat hepatic resection (RHR) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA). METHODS: From December 2005 to December 2016, 138 patients receiving RHR and 188 patients receiving RFA were recruited. VETC was evaluated by immunohistochemical staining for CD34. The survival outcomes of patients with VETC pattern or not were investigated. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the RHR and RFA groups in disease-free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS) as determined by the univariate analysis of the whole cohort. In the subgroup analysis of the VETC-positive cohort, the patients in the RHR group showed a longer median DFS time in contrast to those in the RFA group (15.0 vs. 5.0 months, p = 0.001). Similarly, the patients in the RHR group showed a longer median OS time in contrast to those in the RFA group (39.5 vs. 19 months, p = 0.001). In the VETC-negative cohort, no significant differences in DFS and OS rates between the RHR and RFA groups were observed (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study suggested that RHR was relatively safe and superior to RFA in improving survival outcomes for recurrent early-stage HCC after initial hepatectomy. Furthermore, the VETC pattern may represent a reliable marker for selecting HCC patients who may benefit from RHR.

Shorter operation time and improved surgical outcomes in laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy compared with open donor right hepatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy is a complex procedure, and the safety and feasibility of this operation remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and learning curve of this operation performed by a single surgeon. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the initial 100 donors who underwent pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy or open donor right hepatectomy by a single surgeon from December 2012 to May 2019. Endpoints analyzed included intraoperative results, postoperative complications, and learning curve, which was evaluated using the cumulative sum method based on the operation time. We divided the pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy group into initial and recent groups based on the time point of overcoming the learning curve. RESULTS: The operative time was significantly shorter in the recent pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy group (n = 57; 181.0 ± 35.7 min) than in the open donor right hepatectomy (n = 50; 203.0 ± 37.3 min) and initial pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (n = 43; 282.2 ± 59.2 min) groups (P < .001). Moreover, the length of hospital stay in the recent pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy group was significantly reduced compared to that in the open donor right hepatectomy group (7.7 ± 1.2 vs 5.8 ± 1.4; P < .001). The complication rate was reduced from 10% in the open donor right hepatectomy group and 8% in the initial pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy group to 2% in the recent pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy group. CONCLUSION: As technology advances, the surgical outcomes of pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy are comparable and the operation time of pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy is superior to those of open donor hepatectomy.

Multimodal therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: the role of surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Liver cancer is one of the widest spread malignancies in the world and its incidence is still on the rise. The surgical resection of liver cancer has become a widely performed procedure with considerably improved outcomes, low mortality rate, transfusions, and post-op bed stay. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our goal with this paper was to conduct a narrative review of the literature in regard to the surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). RESULTS: There are various modalities of treatment for the HCC, e.g., hepatic resection, LT, or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) - the selection of a specific treatment regimen plays a decisive role in the survival rate of the patient and this, in turn, is guided by factors like size and distribution of lesion and the stage of malignancy. A more efficient patient selection for each treatment increases the survival rate of the patients in each subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical procedures play a crucial role in treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma as part of a multimodal therapy.

Optimal hepatic surgery: Are we making progress in North America?

BACKGROUND: The aim of this analysis was to determine whether optimal outcomes have increased in recent years. Hepatic surgery is high risk, but regionalization and minimally invasive approaches have evolved. Best practices also have been defined with the goal of improving outcomes. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried. Analyses were performed separately for partial (≤2 segments), major (≥3 segments), and all hepatectomies. Optimal hepatic surgery was defined as the absence of mortality, serious morbidity, need for a postoperative invasive procedure or reoperation, prolonged length of stay (<75th percentile) or readmission. Tests of trend, χ2, and multivariable analyses were performed. RESULTS: From 2014 to 2018, 17,082 hepatectomies, including 11,862 partial hepatectomies and 5,220 major hepatectomies, were analyzed. Minimally invasive approaches increased from 25.6% in 2014 to 29.6% in 2018 (P < .01) and were performed more frequently for partial hepatectomies (34.2%) than major hepatectomies (14.4%) (P < .01). Operative time decreased from 220 minutes in 2014 to 208 minutes in 2018 (P < .05) and was lower in partial hepatectomies (189 vs 258 minutes for major hepatectomies) (P < .01). Mortality (0.7%) and length of stay (4 days) were lower for partial hepatectomies compared with major hepatectomies (1.9%; 6 days), and length of stay decreased for both partial hepatectomies (5 days in 2014 to 4 days in 2018) and major hepatectomies (6 days in 2014 to 6 days in 2018) (all P < .01). Postoperative sepsis (2.9% in 2014 and 2.4% in 2018), bile leaks (6% in 2014 and 4.8% in 2018), and liver failure (3.7% in 2014 and 3.3% in 2018) decreased for all patients (<.05). On multivariable analyses, overall morbidity decreased for major hepatectomies (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.99) and all hepatectomies (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.94-0.99, both P < .01), and optimal hepatic surgery increased over time for partial hepatectomies (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02-1.09) and all hepatectomies (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.07, both P < .01). CONCLUSION: Over a 5-year period in North America, minimally invasive hepatectomies have increased, while operative time, postoperative sepsis, bile leaks, liver failure, and prolonged length of stay have decreased. Optimal hepatic surgery has increased for partial and all hepatectomies and is achieved more often in partial than in major resections.

Significance of liver resection for intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma according to subclassification.

BACKGROUND: Patients diagnosed with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) encompass a broad clinical population. Kinki criteria subclassifications have been proposed to better predict prognoses and determine appropriate treatment strategies for these patients. This study validated the prognostic significance within the Kinki criteria substages and analyzed the role of liver resection in patients with intermediate stage HCC. METHODS: Patients with intermediate stage HCC (n = 378) were retrospectively subclassified according to the Kinki criteria (B1, n = 123; B2, n = 225; and B3, n = 30). We analyzed the overall survival (OS) and treatment methods. RESULTS: The OS was significantly different between adjacent substages. Patients in substage B1 who underwent liver resection had a significantly better prognosis than those who did not, even after propensity score matching (PSM). Patients in substage B2 who underwent liver resection had a significantly better prognosis than those who did not; however, there was no difference after PSM. There was no difference in prognosis based on treatments among patients in substage B3. CONCLUSIONS: The Kinki criteria clearly stratify patients with intermediate stage HCC by prognosis. For substage B1 HCC patients, liver resection provides a better prognosis than other treatment modalities. In patients with substage B2 and B3, an alternative approach is required.

Outcomes of Hepatic Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Associated with Portal Vein Invasion.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate our experience of liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients associated with macroscopic portal vein invasion (PVI). METHODS: Consecutive HCC patients who underwent liver resection for HCC between November 2009 & June 2019 were included. To overcome selection bias between patients with and without macroscopic PVI, we performed 1:1 match using propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: Macroscopic PVI was detected in 37 patients (12.8%). We divided our patients into two groups according to the presence of macroscopic PVI. After PSM, 36 patients of PVI group were matched with 36 patients from Non-PVI group. After PSM, both groups were well balanced regarding tumor site, number, liver resection extent and type. Longer operation time and more blood loss were noted in PVI group. Higher incidence of post-operative morbidities occurred in PVI group especially, post-hepatectomy liver dysfunction. The 1-, 2-, and 3-y overall survival rates for Non-PVI group were 85.3%, 64.6%, and 64.6% & 69.8%, 42%, and 0% for PVI group, respectively (P = 0.009). There were no significant differences regarding the recurrence rate, site, and its management. The 1-, 2-, and 3-y disease-free survival (DFS) rates for Non-PVI group were 81.7%, 72.3%, and 21.7% & 67.7%, 42.3%, and 0% for PVI group, respectively (P = 0.172). CONCLUSION: Surgical management of advanced HCCs with macroscopic PVI is feasible, and associated with comparable DFS but poorer overall survival, compared to patients without PVI.

Assessment of Magnet status and Textbook Outcomes among medicare beneficiaries undergoing hepato-pancreatic surgery for cancer.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between hospital Magnet status recognition and postoperative outcomes following complex cancer surgery remains ill-defined. We sought to characterize Textbook Outcome (TO) rates among patients undergoing (HP) surgery for cancer in Magnet versus non-Magnet centers. METHODS: Medicare beneficiaries undergoing HP surgery between 2015 and 2017 were identified. The association of postoperative TO (no complications/extended length-of-stay/90-day mortality/90-day readmission) with Magnet designation was examined after adjusting for competing risk factors. RESULTS: Among 10,997 patients, 21.3% (n = 2337) patients underwent surgery at Magnet hospitals (non-Magnet centers: 78.7%, n = 8660). On multivariable analysis, patients undergoing HP surgery had comparable odds of achieving a TO at Magnet versus non-Magnet hospitals (hepatectomy: odds ratio [OR]: 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94-1.17; pancreatectomy-OR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.74-1.06). Patients treated at hospitals with a high nurse-to-bed ratio had higher odds of achieving a TO irrespective of whether they received surgery at Magnet (high vs. low nurse-to-bed ratio; OR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.01-1.89) or non-Magnet centers (OR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.10-1.45). Similarly, hospital HP volume was strongly associated with higher odds of TO following HP surgery in both Magnet (Leapfrog compliant vs. noncompliant; OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.06-1.44) and non-Magnet centers (OR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.11-1.26). CONCLUSION: Hospital Magnet designation was not an independent factor of superior outcomes after HP surgery. Rather, hospital-level factors such as nurse-to-bed ratio and HP procedural volume drove outcomes.

Tumor Biology Impacts Survival in Surgically Managed Primary Hepatic Vascular Malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic angiosarcoma (AS) and hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE) are rare primary hepatic vascular malignancies (PHVM) that remain poorly understood. To guide management, we sought to identify factors and trends predicting survival after surgical intervention using a national database. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database patients with a diagnosis of PHVM were identified. Clinicopathologic factors were extracted and compared. Overall survival (OS) was estimated and predictors of survival were identified. RESULTS: Three hundred ninty patients with AS and 216 with HEHE were identified. Only 16% of AS and 36% of HEHE patients underwent surgery. The median OS for patients who underwent surgical intervention was 97 months, with 5-year OS of 30% for AS versus 69% for HEHE patients (P< 0.001). Tumor biology strongly impacted OS, with AS histology (Hazard Ratio [HR] of 3.61 [1.55-8.42]), moderate/poor tumor differentiation (HR = 3.86 [1.03-14.46]) and tumor size (HR = 1.01 [1.00-1.01]) conferring worse prognosis. The presence of metastatic disease in the surgically managed cohort (HR = 5.22 [2.01-13.57]) and involved surgical margins (HR = 3.87 [1.59-9.42]), were independently associated with worse survival. CONCLUSIONS: In this national cohort of PHVM, tumor biology, in the form of angiosarcoma histology, tumor differentiation and tumor size, was strongly associated with worse survival after surgery. Additionally, residual tumor burden after resection, in the form of positive surgical margins or the presence of metastasis, was also negatively associated with survival. Long-term clinical outcomes remain poor for patients with the above high-risk features, emphasizing the need to develop effective forms of adjuvant systemic therapies for this group of malignancies.

Changes in and challenges regarding the surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in China.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common malignant tumor with a high morbidity and mortality in China and elsewhere in the world. Due to its tumor heterogeneity and distant metastasis, patients with HCC often have a poor prognosis. A surgical treatment such as a radical hepatectomy is still the treatment of choice for patients with HCC in current clinical practice. However, the high rate of recurrence and rate of metastasis after surgery diminishes the survival of and prognosis for these patients. In an era of targeted therapy and immunotherapy, the surgical treatment of HCC must change. This review focuses on the definition, feasibility, and criteria with which to evaluate neoadjuvant therapy for HCC in order to provide a new perspective on surgical treatment of HCC.

Factors predicting long-term outcomes of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma after primary curative treatment: the role of surgical or nonsurgical methods.

BACKGROUND: We quantified the elusive effects of putative factors on the clinical course of early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after primary surgical or nonsurgical curative treatment. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed early HCC who received surgical resection (SR) or percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with or without transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) from January 2003 to December 2016 were enrolled. The cumulative overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were compared. A polytomous logistic regression was used to estimate factors for early and late recurrence. Independent predictors of OS were identified using Cox proportional hazard regression. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-five patients underwent SR, and 176 patients underwent RFA, of whom 72 were treated with TACE followed by RFA. Neither match analysis based on propensity score nor multiple adjustment regression yielded a significant difference in DFS and OS between the two groups. Multivariate analysis showed high AFP (> 20 ng/mL), and multinodularity significantly increased risk of early recurrence (< 1 year). In contrast, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus and multinodularity were significantly associated with late recurrence (> 1 year). Multivariate Cox regression with recurrent events as time-varying covariates identified older age (HR = 1.55, 95% CI:1.01-2.36), clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) (HR = 1.97, 95% CI:1.26-3.08), early recurrence (HR = 6.62, 95% CI:3.79-11.6) and late recurrence (HR = 3.75, 95% CI:1.99-7.08) as independent risk factors of mortality. A simple risk score showed fair calibration and discrimination in early HCC patients after primary curative treatment. In the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A subgroup, SR significantly improved DFS compared to RFA with or without TACE. CONCLUSION: Host and tumor factors rather than the initial treatment modalities determine the outcomes of early HCC after primary curative treatment. Statistical models based on recurrence types can predict early HCC prognosis but further external validation is necessary.

Surgical and oncologic outcomes following repeat hepatic resection of colorectal liver metastasis: Who benefits?

BACKGROUND: Resected colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) frequently recur intrahepatically. Selection criteria for repeat hepatectomy of recurrent CRLM are ill-defined. METHODS: We performed an institutional review of patients with recurrent CRLM undergoing repeat hepatectomy from 2003 to 19. Post-recurrence overall (rOS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were analyzed with Cox proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS: n = 147 experienced recurrent CRLM; 11% (n = 38) received repeat hepatectomy of which there was one Clavien-Dindo IIIa complication. Median rOS was 41 months; median RFS was 9 months. Improved rOS and RFS were independently associated with additional post-operative chemotherapy after repeat hepatectomy (HR 0.35 and 0.34, respectively); poor rOS with recurrent CRLM >3 cm (HR 4.4) and <12 months from first hepatectomy to recurrence (HR 4.8); poor RFS with ≥3 recurrence liver metastases (HR 2.8) (All P < 0.05). DISCUSSION: Repeat hepatectomy for recurrent CRLM can be performed safely. Worse survival following repeat hepatectomy is independently associated with >3 cm and ≥3 liver lesions at recurrence, and <12 months to recurrence. Additional post-operative chemotherapy after repeat hepatectomy is associated with improved outcomes.

Impact of preoperative TACE on incidences of microvascular invasion and long-term post-hepatectomy survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients: A propensity score matching analysis.

BACKGROUND: To study the influence of preoperative transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) on the incidence of microvascular invasion (MVI) and long-term survival outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. METHODS: Between January 1, 2010 and December 1, 2014, consecutive HCC patients who underwent curative liver resection were enrolled in this study. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were used to identify independent predictive factors of MVI. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare the incidences of MVI and prognosis between patients who did and did not receive preoperative TACE. Factors associated with Disease-Free Survival (DFS) and Overall survival (OS) were identified using Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: Of 1624 patients, 590 received preoperative TACE. The incidence of MVI was significantly lower in patients with preoperative TACE than those without preoperative TACE (39.15% vs. 45.36%, p = 0.015). After PSM, the incidences of MVI were similar in the two groups (38.85% vs. 41.10%, p = 0.473). Multivariable regression analysis revealed preoperative TACE to have no impact on the incidence of MVI. Before PSM, survival of patients with preoperative TACE was significantly worse than those without preoperative TACE (p = 0.032 for DFS and p = 0.027 for OS). After PSM, the difference became insignificant (p = 0.465 for DFS and p = 0.307 for OS). After adjustment for other prognostic variables in the propensity-matched cohort, preoperative TACE was still found not to be associated with DFS and OS after HCC resection. Both before and after PSM, the prognosis of patients was not significantly different between the two groups for BCLC stages 0, A, and B. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative TACE did not influence the incidence of MVI and prognosis of patients with HCC who underwent 'curative' liver resection.

Open hepatic resection in the elderly at two tertiary referral centers.

BACKGROUND: Surgeons are being increasingly called upon to operate on the very elderly. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes following hepatectomy in patients ≥80 years of age at two tertiary care centers. METHODS: All adult patients who underwent liver resection from 2001 to 2017 were included. Primary outcome was 90-day postoperative mortality. Secondary outcomes included 30-day postoperative mortality and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Between 2001 and 2017, 2397 patients underwent liver resection. On unadjusted analysis, patients ≥80 years of age had higher rates of 90-day mortality (13.3% vs. 3.6%, p < 0.001), 30-day mortality (5.6% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.01), MI (7.9% vs. 3.5%, p = 0.04), and UTI (10.0% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.02). On multivariable analysis, age ≥80 years was significantly associated with 90-day postoperative mortality (OR 4.51, 95%CI 2.11-9.67, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Across these two major referral tertiary care centers, very elderly patients had higher rates of 90-day and 30-day postoperative mortality on both unadjusted and adjusted analyses.

Laparoscopic partial hepatectomy is cost-effective when performed in high volume centers: A five state analysis.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies comparing the efficacy of laparoscopic (LHR) and open hepatic resection (OHR) have not evaluated inpatient costs. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases to identify patients undergoing hepatic resection between 2010 and 2014. RESULTS: 10,239 patients underwent hepatic resection. 865 (8%) underwent LHR and 9374 (92%) underwent OHR. On adjusting for hospital volume, patients undergoing LHR had a lower risk of respiratory (OR 0.64, 95% CI [0.52, 0.78]), wound (OR 0.48; 95% CI [0.29, 0.79]) and hematologic (OR 0.57; 95% CI [0.44, 0.73]) complication as well as a lower risk of being in the highest quartile of cost (0.58; 95% CI [0.43, 0.77]) than those undergoing OHR. Patients undergoing LHR in very high volume (>314 hepatectomies/year) centers had lower risk-adjusted 90-day aggregate costs of care than those undergoing OHR (-$8022; 95% CI [-$11,732, -$4311). DISCUSSION: Laparoscopic partial hepatectomy is associated with lower risk of postoperative complication than OHR. This translates to lower aggregate costs in very high-volume centers.

Recurrence at surgical margin following hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases is not associated with R1 resection and does not impact survival.

BACKGROUND: Resection margin status has traditionally been associated with tumor recurrence and oncological outcome following liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. Previous studies, however, did not address the impact of resection margin on the site of tumor recurrence and did not differentiate between true local recurrence at the resection margin and recurrence elsewhere in the liver. This study aimed to determine whether positive resection margins determine local recurrence and whether recurrence at the surgical margin influences long-term survival. METHODS: Clinicopathological data and oncological outcomes of patients who underwent curative resection for colorectal liver metastases between 2012 and 2017 at 2 major hepatobiliary centers (Bern, Switzerland, and Berlin, Germany) were assessed. Cross-sectional imaging following hepatectomy was reviewed by radiologists in both centers to distinguish between recurrence at the resection margin, defined as hepatic local recurrence, and intrahepatic recurrence elsewhere. The association between surgical margin status and location of tumor recurrence was evaluated, and the impact on overall survival was determined. RESULTS: During the study period, 345 consecutive patients underwent hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Histologic surgical margins were positive for tumor cells (R1) in 63 patients (18%). After a median follow-up time of 34 months, tumor recurrence was identified in 154 patients (45%). Hepatic local recurrence was not detected more frequently after R1 than after R0 resection (P = .555). Hepatic local recurrence was not associated with worse overall survival (P = .436), while R1 status significantly impaired overall survival (P = .025). Additionally, overall survival was equivalent between patients with hepatic local recurrence and patients with any intrahepatic and/or extrahepatic recurrence. In patients with intrahepatic recurrence only, oncological outcomes improved if local hepatic therapy was possible (resection or ablation) in comparison to patients treated only with chemotherapy or best supportive care (3-year overall survival: 85% vs 39%; P < .0001). CONCLUSION: The incidence of hepatic local recurrence after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases is independent of R1 resection margin status. Additionally, hepatic local recurrence at the resection margin is not associated with worse overall survival compared with any other intra- or extrahepatic recurrence. Therefore, R1 status at hepatectomy seems to be a surrogate factor for advanced disease without influencing location of recurrence and thereby oncological outcome. This finding may support decision-making when extending the indication for surgery in borderline resectable colorectal liver metastases.